May 28, 2009

Inertia

Not me, although I'm a big fan of intertia whilst poolside and DG and TG are busy jumping and splashing and swimming. No, I'm thinking of my commute. I always have a book, a magazine or two, probably a newspaper or tabloid, and, of course, some good knitting. Whether I get a seat or simply am balancing whilst grabbing the overhead pole, I am doing something. Today, I was reading a magazine article and knitting (and not bumping into my seat-mate), yet taking a chance to survey my fellow commuters.

Unfortunately, few of my fellow commuters were doing anything at all. A couple were reading the Express. One was reading a Dean Koontz piece-o'-crap (no, those aren't actual books), and one law firm employee was editing a brief in draft format. Two Hill or think tank staffers were reading policy papers. Everyone else (more than 30 people) was either listening to music or sitting doing nothing. I don't understand having between 20-60 minutes a day where one does nothing. Now, I admit, I'm a busy single mother: I have to use any free time to accomplish anything I have any hope to achieve, whether that is reading a book, knitting a sweater, or snarking at fellow citizens. Maybe it's just envy that makes me sneer at my fellow commuters who have nothing they want to achieve between 7:45 and 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 and 5:45 P.M. (give or take ten minutes).

I don't want to lose that hour and a half every day. I have books I want to read, UFOs*to complete knitting. MNOT agrees with me. We both have a morbid fear of being without a book in a situation where we have to stay put. TG is beginning to pick up this good phobia. She always has a book or two with her (even when going to play tennis or do karate). Last week, in school, she had to list something that was worthy of a celebration, and she wrote: "I found a book I like."

So, I don't want to judge, but can't help it. What kind of person chooses to do nothing during 30 to 45 minutes of enforced idleness? I try to imagine, to have empathy: a tired person? If they're more tired than I am with a full-time job, a four year old, a nine year old, and what-have-you, I'll eat a rutabaga (I'm otherwise quite unlikely to do that). This is supposed to be a highly educated (but no-one said "highly intellectually curious", obviously) town, yet all these self-proclaimed smart, ambitious, and very, very busy people won't grab an opportunity to read a book or magazine? I understand not doing craft stuff like knitting on Metro. Even with a seat, it takes a fair amount of coordination to not annoy one's fellow commuters. But books? Especially know with the little handheld computerized book-readers, which I can't stand, but I'm glad they're out there for people who like them and can afford them. And I suppose some people who I think are listening to music could be watching podcasts of important policy addresses, but most of them look like (and it sounds like, since their earphones, for the most part, aren't of the highest quality and thus inflict their musical choices on their fellow travellers) they're just sitting there listening to modern music of varying types.

Obviously, this is a legitimate lifestyle choice, and it reflects ill on me that I sniff on it. I think it's the Scandinavian/Yankee parts of me (pretty much all of me): you know, idle hands do the devil's work. I was raised to take real pleasure in doing things. Even reading a book sometimes seems too idle, although I don't let that stop me. So I just don't get the, "oh, I'll do absolutely nothing" mindset, unless I'm on vacation. Maybe they're all on vacation? Or maybe they're just different than I am, shockingly enough. I've got to work on this judgmental thing.

*UFO = Unfinished Object, in the knitting universe. Once you have more than two or three, they become more terrifying than flesh-eating-alien zombies, which is probably a movie Insane Ex will let DG see.

13 comments:

cookie monster said...

Whats a rutabaga?

I'm a big fan of reading a magazine when on a journey. Failing that i like to sleep. I just hope i dont snore!!

Grant said...

You should bring your soapbox and preach against the evils of idol hands to the great unwashed masses.

cookie said...

hey FW, guess who decided to start blogging again.....

CyberKitten said...

I used to actually look forward to my 40 minute commute by train when I worked in London.... especially on the way home where I got to wind down with a good book..... If I was actually awake enogh to do something then doing nothing every day would've sent me insane.

jeanie said...

I used to love my commute when I was in Sydney - I would seemingly sit idle most mornings, and watch faces and scenarios - and once out of the tunnels I would pretend I was a tourist and just suck in all the beauty of the scenery. It was a zen hour.

On the way home, I would read.

anonymous dave said...

maybe they aren't all doing nothing. the commuter could be the only time they are left alone, no phone ringing or people demanding things from them, where they can just sit and think. thinking is doing something. most of them are probably just vegetables, though.

Foilwoman said...

Cookiedear: here's a link to a rutabaga: http://www.umassvegetable.org/images/soils_crops_pest_mgt/crop/rutabaga2.jpg

If you snore, you don't snore louder than TG and DG. Oh, and I'll update my links to your knew blog.

Grant: I think I just did that, sort of.

Prom: Good to see you (in disguise).

Mr. Cat: Knitting on the way in for me ('cause I get a seat most days at my start off station); and reading on the way home.

Jeanie: Yes, I use the knitting as a chance to observe. People are so naked while they drowse during the morning commute. At night, they're more "on". Most people trying to pick up other people is after work, not beforehand.

AnonDave: Yeah, I hope for deep thoughts and introspection, and, God forbid (if you're a Republican) empathy. Mostly, I just see blank faces.

rootlesscosmo said...

Listening to music isn't necessarily doing nothing. I survive the tedium of working out thanks to my iPod and ear buds. This past Thursday Arthur Honegger Symphony No. 2 followed by San Francisco Jazz Collective 2005 disc. Music can (though it doesn't always) engage as much of your attention--emotional, analytic, tail-feather-shaking, and more--as a book.

Foilwoman said...

Rootless: Definitely, if someone is listening the Ring Cycle or the Goldberg Variations or even a decent jazz recording or good blues or good whatever, yeah, I'll allow that has value. But exactly how much does most commercially available music that one frequently overears on cheap earphones contribute to the world? Aside from keeping the owner of those cheap earphones blissfully silent and not trying to strike up a conversation with me?

rootlesscosmo said...

keeping the owner of those cheap earphones blissfully silent and not trying to strike up a conversation with me

Not a valueless contribution in itself, I think. But as one who grew up in the 40's and 50's before the High-Low boundary got "interrogated," not to say waterboarded--even learned examiners of pop assumed the boundary was there, and they were boldly crossing it--I've tried to lose those universalizing blues. Duke Ellington said there were only two kinds of music, good and bad; the problem is in reaching agreement on what goes where, and I think it's insoluble. If people can lose themselves in music, and as long as they don't oblige me to listen to it, they're welcome to it. I love Chopin but am bored, even annoyed, by Liszt; maybe the person on the stationary bicycle next to mine is rapt in the Transcendental Etudes?

Foilwoman said...

Rootless: Most definitely. A good thing for me and for them (they don't get an earful, that way), but really: isn't Duran Duran just a total wast of time, no matter how you slice it?

rootlesscosmo said...

Odds are I'd agree, but I've never heard them. I'm lucky, and I mean that, to have been able to dodge a lot of commercial pop, in music and TV and movies--industrial job, then retirement on pretty much my own terms. My tastes are fairly broad but with very few exceptions the music I like is made by professionals, not amateurs or self-taught media creatures; it's complicated; and it engages grown-up emotional states. So for example I'd much rather listen to Eddie Palmieri than Steve Reich. (I once seriously suggested The Famous Flames as the name for a chamber group I was in, because I think James Brown's backup band was a model of crisp, perfectly coordinated ensemble playing. The others voted this down as frivolous; oddly, they rejected my non-frivolous alternative, The Mormon Tabernacle Choir, too. There's no pleasing some people.)

We've wandered far afield, so what the hell: if you've never heard any of Nikolai Medtner's piano music (he's on Wikipedia), check some out--the F minor piano sonata or the "Forgotten Melodies," played by the astonishing Marc-André Hamelin. And I just got Joshua Redman's recent CD "Down East" and was knocked out. Maybe Prince can play in that league for pure-D musical chops, but the razzle-dazzle gets awfully tiresome and his stuff is pretty thin expressively; if I want a diva I'll take Natalie Dessay. Anybody else? I can't think of one.

Foilwoman said...

Oh, Rootless Wonder, thank you. And wandering far afield isn't a problem here. I'm the antithesis of a single issue writer (although Metro annoyances are a frequent theme). When I get home tonight, the Foilkids are with their father, I can relax and listen to some new (to me) music. A treat I'm looking forward to. Again, thanks.